Flag of the United States of America
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know Expand details arrow

Labor Unions & Bargaining Units

Discover federal labor and union data, including bargaining units and collective bargaining expenses

Updated monthly | Data as of May 2026


What percentage of federal government employees are in a bargaining unit?


35.3%
of federal employees are represented by a union

In the federal government, public-sector unions represent eligible employees in negotiations with agencies over working conditions like schedules, safety, and performance procedures. Not all federal employees are eligible to be included in a bargaining unit—supervisors, managers, and certain policy or national security roles are excluded by law. As a result, union representation in the federal workforce varies by agency and occupation.

Federal workforce by bargaining unit status


View data by:

Department*

Agency*

Subagency*

Group

Date range

Filters (2)

FROM MONTH/YEAR

May 2025

TO MONTH/YEAR

May 2026



Bargaining unit profiles


Filter by keyword

Separate multiple filters with a space in between

Department*

Agency*

Subagency*

Union*

Bargaining unit code*

Enter at least 2 numbers to search for a bargaining unit code

Filters

Subagency Bargaining unit description Union Local Total employees in bargaining unit Bargaining unit code OLMR number
MEAT GRADING AND CERTIFICATION BRANCH; WASHINGTON, DC AFGE None REDACTED 1608 20240
FEDERAL GRAIN INSPECTION SERVICE; WASHINGTON, DC AFGE None REDACTED 1616 20245
AGRICULTURE MARKETING SERVICE, PACKERS AND STOCKYARDS DIVISION AFGE None REDACTED 1618 20246
BELTSVILLE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER; BELTSVILLE, MD AFGE 3147 REDACTED 1168 20040
NATIONAL ARBORETUM; WASHINGTON, DC AFGE 3147 REDACTED 1199 20050
WESTERN REGION RESEARCH CENTER; ALBANY, CA AFGE 1657 REDACTED 1284 20070
WESTERN REGION RESEARCH CENTER; ALBANY, CA AFGE 1657 REDACTED 1303 20073
AGRICULTURE RESEARCH, EDUCATION AND ECONOMICS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE SOUTHEAST AREA NFFE 1752 REDACTED 1307 20075
SOUTHEAST FRUIT AND NUT TREE LABORATORY; BYRON, GA AFGE 987 REDACTED 1444 20145
NATIONAL ANIMAL DISEASE CENTER; AMES, IA AFGE 2315 REDACTED 1529 20190
NORTHERN STATES AREA; ST. PAUL, MN AFGE 3748 REDACTED 1548 20207
EASTERN REGION RESEARCH SERVICE; PHILADELPHIA, PA AFGE 1331 REDACTED 1572 20220
NORTHERN REGION RESEARCH CENTER; PEORIA, IL AFGE 3247 REDACTED 1599 20235
AGRICULTURE RESEARCH SERVICE, APPALACHIAN FRUIT RESEARCH STATION; KEARNEYSVILLE, WV AFGE 43 REDACTED 1601 20236
STATE OF ARKANSAS AFGE NONE REDACTED 1933 20550
STATE OF COLORADO AFGE 3499 REDACTED 1937 20555
RURAL DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS CENTER AFGE None REDACTED 1942 20561
RURAL DEVELOPMENT STATE OF MONTANA AFGE 1585 REDACTED 1947 20570
RURAL DEVELOPMENT NEW MEXICO AFGE NONE REDACTED 1958 20585
STATE OF OKLAHOMA AFGE 3354 REDACTED 1963 20591
RURAL DEVELOPMENT, OREGON RURAL DEVELOPMENT NFFE 7 REDACTED 1964 20593
PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE STATE DIRECTOR AFGE NONE REDACTED 1970 20598
RURAL DEVELOPMENT STATE OF TEXAS AFGE NONE REDACTED 1974 20600
WASHINGTON RURAL DEVELOP NFFE 758 REDACTED 1981 20605
RURAL BUSINESS AND COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE, WASHINGTON, D.C. AFSCME 20 REDACTED 1987 20613

How are taxpayer funds being spent on federal collective bargaining activities?


$181.6M
total collective bargaining expenses for FY 2024

Agencies governed by the Federal Service Labor‑Management Relations Statute are required to provide OPM with detailed information on the costs of collective bargaining, as well as current active collective bargaining agreements (CBAs). Taxpayer expenditures for collective bargaining include compensation for employees on official time spent negotiating CBAs, processing grievances, conducting mediation and arbitration, as well as costs for arbitral fees, travel, lodging, technology, office space, and more — with 79.6% of total costs attributable to personnel compensation. Specific agreements reached between agencies and Federal sector unions are available on OPM’s Collective Bargaining Agreements page.

To reinforce the importance of transparency in these expenditures, OPM leadership has highlighted this issue publicly. In the Director’s recent blog post, “Show Me the Money,” Director Kupor emphasizes the scale of taxpayer-funded bargaining costs and the need for agencies to ensure these resources are used effectively and responsibly.

Collective bargaining expense details


View data by:

Select a calculation:

Responding agency*

Expense category*

Filters


How has taxpayer-funded union time (TFUT) changed from FY 2019 to FY 2024?
+24.3%
increase in TFUT hours used from FY 2019 to FY 2024

+3.9%
increase in employees represented by a labor union from FY 2019 to FY 2024

While the number of bargaining unit employees grew modestly over the past five years, the hours labor representatives spent on union activities — and their cost to taxpayers — rose at a much faster pace. From FY 2019 to FY 2024, per-employee TFUT usage climbed from 1.96 to 2.35 hours, and related compensation costs increased 53.8%, reaching $207.5 million in FY 2024.

Taxpayer-funded union time usage details


View data by:

Responding agency*

Reporting category*

Filters


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙
Give feedback