Flag of the United States of America
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know Expand details arrow

Labor Unions & Bargaining Units

Discover federal labor and union data, including bargaining units and collective bargaining expenses

Updated monthly | Data as of April 2026


What percentage of federal government employees are in a bargaining unit?


43.8%
of federal employees are represented by a union

In the federal government, public-sector unions represent eligible employees in negotiations with agencies over working conditions like schedules, safety, and performance procedures. Not all federal employees are eligible to be included in a bargaining unit—supervisors, managers, and certain policy or national security roles are excluded by law. As a result, union representation in the federal workforce varies by agency and occupation.

Federal workforce by bargaining unit status


View data by:

Department*

Agency*

Subagency*

Group

Date range

Filters (2)

FROM MONTH/YEAR

April 2025

TO MONTH/YEAR

April 2026



Bargaining unit profiles


Filter by keyword

Separate multiple filters with a space in between

Subagency*

Union*

BUS code*

Enter at least 2 numbers to search for a BUS code

Filters

Subagency Activity Union Local Total employees in bargaining unit OLMR number BUS CPDF
AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND (AFMC) AFGE COUNCIL 214 REDACTED 51765 2539 AF02
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE None None REDACTED None 2081 AF03
AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND (AFMC) AFGE COUNCIL 214 REDACTED 51765 2539 AF03
AIR FORCE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION, WASHINGTON D.C. AFGE 1092 REDACTED 50040 1167 AF06
ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE; WASHINGTON, DC None None REDACTED None 1185 AF06
AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND (AFMC) AFGE COUNCIL 214 REDACTED 51765 2539 AF06
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE AND JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO, 902D MISSION SUPPORT GROUP, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS AFGE 1840 REDACTED 52240 2783 AF06
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE AND JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO, 902D MISSION SUPPORT GROUP, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS AFGE 1840 REDACTED 52240 2783 AF09
AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER – OPERATING LOCATION, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA AFGE None REDACTED None 5675 AF09
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY; COLORADO SPRINGS, CO AFGE 1867 REDACTED 50680 2051 AF0B
AIR FORCE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION, WASHINGTON D.C. AFGE 1092 REDACTED 50040 1167 AF0J
JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON; ALASKA AFGE 1101 REDACTED 50140 1436 AF0J
LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, ARIZONA AFGE None REDACTED 50200 1543 AF0J
LITTLE ROCK AIR FORCE BASE, ARKANSAS AFGE 2066 REDACTED 50230 1589 AF0J
30TH SPACE WING; VANDENBERG AFB, CA NFFE 1001 REDACTED 50580 1952 AF0J
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY; COLORADO SPRINGS, CO AFGE 1867 REDACTED 50680 2051 AF0J
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE None None REDACTED None 2081 AF0J
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE AFGE 1113 REDACTED 50810 2135 AF0J
BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE NFFE 1953 REDACTED 51091 2287 AF0J
COLUMBUS AIR FORCE BASE; COLUMBUS, MS AFGE 1296 REDACTED 51290 2363 AF0J
KEESLER AIR FORCE BASE IAFF F-92 REDACTED 51300 2367 AF0J
KEESLER AIR FORCE BASE AFGE 2670 REDACTED 51315 2371 AF0J
3800TH AIR BASE WING (AU), MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, ALABAMA AFGE 997 REDACTED None 2409 AF0J
HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE NFFE 1031 REDACTED 51480 2436 AF0J
HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE NFFE 1031 REDACTED 51490 2437 AF0J

How are taxpayer funds being spent on federal collective bargaining activities?


$181.6M
total collective bargaining expenses for FY 2024

Agencies governed by the Federal Service Labor‑Management Relations Statute are required to provide OPM with detailed information on the costs of collective bargaining, as well as current active collective bargaining agreements (CBAs). Taxpayer expenditures for collective bargaining include compensation for employees on official time spent negotiating CBAs, processing grievances, conducting mediation and arbitration, as well as costs for arbitral fees, travel, lodging, technology, office space, and more — with 79.6% of total costs attributable to personnel compensation. Specific agreements reached between agencies and Federal sector unions are available on OPM’s Collective Bargaining Agreements page.

To reinforce the importance of transparency in these expenditures, OPM leadership has highlighted this issue publicly. In the Director’s recent blog post, “Show Me the Money,” Director Kupor emphasizes the scale of taxpayer-funded bargaining costs and the need for agencies to ensure these resources are used effectively and responsibly.

Collective bargaining expense details


View data by:

Select a calculation:

Responding agency*

Expense category*

Filters


How has taxpayer-funded union time (TFUT) changed from FY 2019 to FY 2024?
+24.3%
increase in TFUT hours used from FY 2019 to FY 2024

+3.9%
increase in employees represented by a labor union from FY 2019 to FY 2024

While the number of bargaining unit employees grew modestly over the past five years, the hours labor representatives spent on union activities — and their cost to taxpayers — rose at a much faster pace. From FY 2019 to FY 2024, per-employee TFUT usage climbed from 1.96 to 2.35 hours, and related compensation costs increased 53.8%, reaching $207.5 million in FY 2024.

Taxpayer-funded union time usage details


View data by:

Responding agency*

Reporting category*

Filters


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙
Give feedback