Flag of the United States of America
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know Expand details arrow
Incomplete Data: A change in Department of War (DOW) data processing prevented some components from submitting June 2026 data. Visuals and downloads with Status and Dynamics data are affected; all non-DOW data is unaffected. See Release Notes for a full list of affected components. Data will be updated once all submissions are received.

Labor Unions & Bargaining Units

Discover federal labor and union data, including bargaining units and collective bargaining expenses

Updated monthly | Data as of June 2026


What percentage of federal government employees are in a bargaining unit?


34.8%
of federal employees are represented by a union

In the federal government, public-sector unions represent eligible employees in negotiations with agencies over working conditions like schedules, safety, and performance procedures. Not all federal employees are eligible to be included in a bargaining unit—supervisors, managers, and certain policy or national security roles are excluded by law. As a result, union representation in the federal workforce varies by agency and occupation.

Federal workforce by bargaining unit status


View data by:

Department*

Agency*

Subagency*

Group

Date range

Filters (2)

FROM MONTH/YEAR

June 2025

TO MONTH/YEAR

June 2026



Loading data...

Bargaining unit profiles


Filter by keyword

Separate multiple filters with a space in between

Department*

Agency*

Subagency*

Union*

Bargaining unit code*

Enter at least 2 numbers to search for a bargaining unit code

Filters

Subagency Bargaining unit description Union Local Bargaining unit code Total employees in bargaining unit Professional Non-professional Blue collar White collar
MEAT GRADING AND CERTIFICATION BRANCH; WASHINGTON, DC AFGE None 1608 124 0 124 0 124
FEDERAL GRAIN INSPECTION SERVICE; WASHINGTON, DC AFGE None 1616 173 0 173 0 173
AGRICULTURE MARKETING SERVICE, PACKERS AND STOCKYARDS DIVISION AFGE None 1618 48 12 36 0 48
BELTSVILLE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER; BELTSVILLE, MD AFGE 3147 1168 137 4 133 47 90
NATIONAL ARBORETUM; WASHINGTON, DC AFGE 3147 1199 22 0 22 2 20
WESTERN REGION RESEARCH CENTER; ALBANY, CA AFGE 1657 1284 46 8 38 0 46
WESTERN REGION RESEARCH CENTER; ALBANY, CA AFGE 1657 1303 13 12 1 0 13
AGRICULTURE RESEARCH, EDUCATION AND ECONOMICS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE SOUTHEAST AREA NFFE 1752 1307 104 1 103 21 83
SOUTHEAST FRUIT AND NUT TREE LABORATORY; BYRON, GA AFGE 987 1444 5 0 5 1 4
NATIONAL ANIMAL DISEASE CENTER; AMES, IA AFGE 2315 1529 114 0 114 61 53
NORTHERN STATES AREA; ST. PAUL, MN AFGE 3748 1548 188 12 176 15 173
EASTERN REGION RESEARCH SERVICE; PHILADELPHIA, PA AFGE 1331 1572 41 14 27 0 41
NORTHERN REGION RESEARCH CENTER; PEORIA, IL AFGE 3247 1599 58 3 55 0 58
AGRICULTURE RESEARCH SERVICE, APPALACHIAN FRUIT RESEARCH STATION; KEARNEYSVILLE, WV AFGE 43 1601 16 0 16 5 11
STATE OF ARKANSAS AFGE NONE 1933 31 1 30 0 31
STATE OF COLORADO AFGE 3499 1937 13 0 13 0 13
RURAL DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS CENTER AFGE None 1942 383 2 381 1 382
RURAL DEVELOPMENT STATE OF MONTANA AFGE 1585 1947 15 1 14 0 15
RURAL DEVELOPMENT NEW MEXICO AFGE NONE 1958 20 0 20 0 20
STATE OF OKLAHOMA AFGE 3354 1963 19 0 19 0 19
RURAL DEVELOPMENT, OREGON RURAL DEVELOPMENT NFFE 7 1964 11 0 11 0 11
PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE STATE DIRECTOR AFGE NONE 1970 34 1 33 0 34
RURAL DEVELOPMENT STATE OF TEXAS AFGE NONE 1974 52 1 51 0 52
WASHINGTON RURAL DEVELOP NFFE 758 1981 19 0 19 0 19
RURAL BUSINESS AND COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE, WASHINGTON, D.C. AFSCME 20 1987 26 1 25 0 26

How are taxpayer funds being spent on federal collective bargaining activities?


$181.6M
total collective bargaining expenses for FY 2024

Agencies governed by the Federal Service Labor‑Management Relations Statute are required to provide OPM with detailed information on the costs of collective bargaining, as well as current active collective bargaining agreements (CBAs). Taxpayer expenditures for collective bargaining include compensation for employees on official time spent negotiating CBAs, processing grievances, conducting mediation and arbitration, as well as costs for arbitral fees, travel, lodging, technology, office space, and more — with 79.6% of total costs attributable to personnel compensation. Specific agreements reached between agencies and Federal sector unions are available on OPM’s Collective Bargaining Agreements page.

To reinforce the importance of transparency in these expenditures, OPM leadership has highlighted this issue publicly. In the Director’s recent blog post, “Show Me the Money,” Director Kupor emphasizes the scale of taxpayer-funded bargaining costs and the need for agencies to ensure these resources are used effectively and responsibly.

Collective bargaining expense details


View data by:

Select a calculation:

Responding agency*

Expense category*

Filters


Loading data...

How has taxpayer-funded union time (TFUT) changed from FY 2019 to FY 2024?
+24.3%
increase in TFUT hours used from FY 2019 to FY 2024

+3.9%
increase in employees represented by a labor union from FY 2019 to FY 2024

While the number of bargaining unit employees grew modestly over the past five years, the hours labor representatives spent on union activities — and their cost to taxpayers — rose at a much faster pace. From FY 2019 to FY 2024, per-employee TFUT usage climbed from 1.96 to 2.35 hours, and related compensation costs increased 53.8%, reaching $207.5 million in FY 2024.

Taxpayer-funded union time usage details


View data by:

Responding agency*

Reporting category*

Filters


Loading data...

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙